Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Review of Public Personnel Administration
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kellough, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Nigro, L. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Pay for Performance in Georgia State Government

Employee Perspectives on GeorgiaGain After 5 Years

J. Edward Kellough

University of Georgia

Lloyd G. Nigro

Georgia State University

In the mid-1990s, the State of Georgia launched a major reform of its personnel system. One part of the reform included a new approach to compensation called GeorgiaGain. With pay-for-performance as its centerpiece, GeorgiaGain was a comprehensive effort to modernize many of the state’s human resources management (HRM) practices. Its goals included the establishment of a state-of-the-art performance management system, implementing performance measurement and evaluation procedures that supervisors and subordinates alike trusted, setting up a competitive compensation plan, and streamlining the state’s position description and classification system. This article reports on the findings of major survey of state employees conducted early in 2000 designed to explore employees’ perceptions of the impact in areas such as job satisfaction, trust and confidence in the state’s HRM system, and the effects of pay-for-performance. Overall, employees were highly critical of the reform and believed that it had not produced the intended outcomes in most areas.

Review of Public Personnel Administration, Vol. 22, No. 2, 146-166 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/0734371X0202200206


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Public Adm Res TheoryHome page
R. Paul Battaglio Jr and S. E. Condrey
Reforming Public Management: Analyzing the Impact of Public Service Reform on Organizational and Managerial Trust
J. Public Adm. Res. Theory., October 1, 2009; 19(4): 689 - 707.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Review of Public Personnel AdministrationHome page
R. F. Durant, A. M. Girth, and J. M. Johnston
American Exceptionalism, Human Resource Management, and the Contract State
Review of Public Personnel Administration, September 1, 2009; 29(3): 207 - 229.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Review of Public Personnel AdministrationHome page
Seong Soo Oh and G. B. Lewis
Can Performance Appraisal Systems Inspire Intrinsically Motivated Employees?
Review of Public Personnel Administration, June 1, 2009; 29(2): 158 - 167.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Review of Public Personnel AdministrationHome page
J. J. Llorens
Uncovering the Determinants of Competitive State Government Wages
Review of Public Personnel Administration, December 1, 2008; 28(4): 308 - 326.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Public Adm Res TheoryHome page
K. J. Meier and A. Hicklin
Employee Turnover and Organizational Performance: Testing a Hypothesis from Classical Public Administration
J. Public Adm. Res. Theory., October 1, 2008; 18(4): 573 - 590.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Public Adm Res TheoryHome page
M. K. Feeney
Sector Perceptions among State-Level Public Managers
J. Public Adm. Res. Theory., July 1, 2008; 18(3): 465 - 494.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
International Review of Administrative SciencesHome page
V. Forest
Performance-related pay and work motivation: theoretical and empirical perspectives for the French civil service
International Review of Administrative Sciences, June 1, 2008; 74(2): 325 - 339.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Public Adm Res TheoryHome page
A. Bertelli and S. E. Feldmann
Strategic Appointments
J. Public Adm. Res. Theory., January 1, 2007; 17(1): 19 - 38.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Public Adm Res TheoryHome page
J. E. Kellough and L. G. Nigro
Dramatic Reform in the Public Service: At-Will Employment and the Creation of a New Public Workforce
J. Public Adm. Res. Theory., July 1, 2006; 16(3): 447 - 466.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Review of Public Personnel AdministrationHome page
S. W. Hays and J. E. Sowa
A Broader Look at the "Accountability" Movement: Some Grim Realities in State Civil Service Systems
Review of Public Personnel Administration, June 1, 2006; 26(2): 102 - 117.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Review of Public Personnel AdministrationHome page
R. P. Battaglio Jr. and S. E. Condrey
Civil Service Reform: Examining State and Local Government Cases
Review of Public Personnel Administration, June 1, 2006; 26(2): 118 - 138.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Review of Public Personnel AdministrationHome page
J. S. Bowman, M. G. Gertz, S. C. Gertz, and R. L. Williams
Civil Service Reform in Florida State Government: Employee Attitudes 1 Year Later
Review of Public Personnel Administration, December 1, 2003; 23(4): 286 - 304.
[Abstract] [PDF]